HERE is a round-up of some of the cases heard at the Isle of Wight Magistrates' Court, for the week commencing September 25, 2023.
Martin Ely, 32, of Hookes Way, Newport.
Assault by beating.
Fine £120, surcharge £468, costs £620.
Alexander Hill, 23, of St Margarets Glade, Ventnor.
Two counts of failing to comply with community order requirements.
Fine £461, costs £60.
Raymond Skelly, 45, of Greenbank, Hadfield, Glossop, Derbyshire.
Four counts of theft.
Surcharge £154, 24-week prison term.
Louise Healey, 38, of East Hill Road, Ryde.
Driving while disqualified, speeding.
Costs £86, surcharge £72, fine £180, 24-month driving disqualification.
Douglas Atkinson, 31, of Amherst Place, Ryde.
Drug driving.
Costs £85, surcharge £114, 12-month community order, to include 185 hours of unpaid work, 29-month driving disqualification.
Joe Male, 24, of Sandown Road, Sandown.
Criminal damage.
Compensation £204.75.
Michael Jurich, 37, of Goldsmid Road, Reading.
Drug driving.
Costs £85, surcharge £48, fine £120, 14-month driving disqualification.
Anthony Serjent, 45, of Fitzroy Street, Sandown.
Two counts of criminal damage, public order offence.
Fine £180, compensation £300.
Jesse Pearce, 50, of Culver Parade, Sandown.
Possession of cannabis.
Costs £85, surcharge £32, fine £80.
Mark Bance, 49, of Kite Hill, Wootton Bridge.
Assault by beating, racially aggravated common assault.
Fine £432, costs £300, surcharge £173.
Samuel Williams, 31, of Barton Road, Newport.
Drug driving.
Costs £85, surcharge £150, fine £375, 12-month driving disqualification.
Bonnie Haynes, 37, of Quarr Close, Ryde.
Drink driving.
Fine £180, costs £85, surcharge £114, 9-month community order, to include 15 rehabilitation days, 26-month driving disqualification.
Maddy Allan-Willshire, 20, of Godric Road, Newport.
Common assault.
Costs £85, 12-month community order, to include a six-month alcohol treatment requirement, 30 rehabilitation days, and 80 hours of unpaid work.
When a court is sitting in the open, the press can report on anything that happens, unless there are specific reporting restrictions.
As a principle, we do not remove a defendant's identifying information (such as name, age and address) from court reports. To do so would be set a precedent and damage the foundations of open justice. It could also defame someone innocent, who happens to have the same name.
House Rules
We do not moderate comments, but we expect readers to adhere to certain rules in the interests of open and accountable debate.
Last Updated:
Report this comment Cancel