Here is a round up of some of the cases heard at the Isle of Wight Magistrates' Court, for the week commencing August 30.
Daniel Sprooles, 49, of East Hill Road, Ryde.
Driving without due care and attention.
Disqualified from driving for six months, costs £85, surcharge £34, fine £120.
Peter Reynolds, 49, of Somerset Road, Ryde.
Possession of cannabis, possession of folding pocket knife, failed to surrender to police.
Three months in custody, suspended for 12 months. Six month alcohol treatment requirement. Fine £80, surcharge £128.
Stephen Ward, 57, of Melbourne Street, Newport.
Drink driving.
Ten penalty points, fine £133. costs £85, surcharge £34.
Craig Smith, 36, of Dame Anthony Close, Binstead.
Drink driving.
Disqualified from driving for 28 months, 140 hours' unpaid work, costs £85, surcharge £95.
Trevor Stanton, 80, of Marina Avenue, Ryde.
Sexual assault on a male. Found guilty after trial.
Costs £650, surcharge £35, fine £345, 12-month restraining order.
Tom Court, 33, of Afton Down, Freshwater.
Drink driving.
Disqualified from driving for 14 months, fine £80, costs £85, surcharge £34.
Anthony Potter, 64, of Trafalgar Road, Newport.
Drunk and disorderly.
Fine £92, costs £85, surcharge £34.
Jonathan Nash, 57, of Westcourt Close, Shorwell.
Drink driving.
Disqualified from driving for 21 months, fine £120, costs £85, surcharge £34.
Ian Phillips, 43, of Trinity Road, Ventnor.
Drink driving.
Disqualified from driving for 12 months, fine £80, costs £85, surcharge £34.
Samuel Martyn Williams, 33, of Great Preston Road, Ryde.
Driving without insurance.
Disqualified from driving for six months, fine £292, surcharge £34, costs £85.
Shaun Battle, 51, of no fixed address.
Drunk and disorderly, failed to surrender to custody, in breach of conditional discharge.
Seven days in custody.
Yan Rowan Peters, 40, of High Street, Ryde.
Drug driving. Found guilty after trial.
Disqualified from driving for 20 months, fine £525, surcharge £53, costs £650.
When a court is sitting in the open, the press can report on anything that happens, unless there are specific reporting restrictions.
As a principle, we do not remove a defendant's identifying information (such as name, age and address) from court reports. To do so would be set a precedent and damage the foundations of open justice. It could also defame someone innocent, who happens to have the same name.
House Rules
We do not moderate comments, but we expect readers to adhere to certain rules in the interests of open and accountable debate.
Last Updated:
Report this comment Cancel