Here is a round up of some of the cases heard at the Isle of Wight Magistrates' Court, for the week commencing March 1.

Helen Louise Gibbons, 53, of Leed Street, Sandown.

Used violence to secure entry to a premises, criminal damage to a police van, breach of a court order.

12-month community order to include 25 rehabilitation days, compensation £50, surcharge £95, costs £50.

Richard Warne, 56, of Green Street, Ryde.

Two counts of using internet enabled device prohibited by sexual harm prevention order. One count of deleting internet history.

Six months in prison, suspended for two years. Rehabilitation requirement to include 30 rehab days. Surcharge £128, costs £85.

Read about the case here

Joshua James Hunt, 25, of George Street, Ryde.

Drink driving, and failing to surrender to custody.

Disqualified from driving for 15 months, fine £160, surcharge £34, costs £85.

Paul Anthony Timms, 63, of Atherley Road, Shanklin.

Sent messages while prohibited by non-molestation order.

Six months in custody, 12-month restraining order, surcharge £128, costs £85.

Hannah Sartini, 22, of Great Preston Road, Ryde.

Drink driving.

Disqualified from driving 23 months. 12-month community order, to include 40 hours of unpaid work. Surcharge £34, costs £85.

Ryan Scott Kessell, 29, of Victoria Road, Newport.

Possession of Class C drugs (valium).

Fine £57, surcharge £34, costs £85.

Victor Paul Chuntz, 64, of Purcell Street, London.

Drove while using hand-held phone.

Pleaded not guilty. Found guilty.

Driving record endorsed with 6 points. Fine £230, surcharge £34, costs £300.

Cameron Joseph Newman, 24, of Fairlee Road, Newport.

Drug driving.

Pleaded not guilty. Found guilty.

Disqualified from driving 14 months. Fine £180, surcharge £34, costs £500.

The publication of these listings is covered by a legal defence called qualified privilege.

When a court is sitting in the open, the press can report on anything that happens, unless there are specific reporting restrictions.

As a principle, we do not remove a defendant's identifying information (such as name, age and address) from court reports. To do so would be set a precedent and damage the foundations of open justice. It could also defame someone innocent, who happens to have the same name.