A CONTROVERSIAL planning application is likely to be reconsidered — after concerns were raised about the way it was approved.
At a meeting of the Isle of Wight Council's planning committee last month, approval was granted for a development of 17 houses at Gibbwell Field, between Nettlestone Hill and Seaview Lane, Nettlestone.
An amendment to the original plans was proposed by Cllr Geoff Brodie — to remove a reference to sheltered housing and replace it with 'appropriate affordable housing' — which was then voted on.
But confusion in the council chamber meant the development was approved by one more vote than it should have been — after one member 'accidentally' voted in favour.
Council monitoring officer Geoff Wild has now recommended the decision be reconsidered by the planning committee, following concerns raised about voting and procedural issues.
At the meeting, committee chair Cllr Chris Quirk took two points of order between the votes cast in favour and those against, which left the motion hanging.
He then started the vote again, causing Cllr Vanessa Churchman — who had continually claimed she would oppose the plans — to vote in favour of the application.
It was approved by six votes to three.
Usually, all the votes would have been cast without interruption — but two votes were taken in favour, both returning different results.
Cllr Quirk also told members — incorrectly — the motion could be amended after it had been passed. However, when councillors raised a number of points following the vote, council officers said no changes could be made.
The Gibbwell Field plans were submitted by SGJ Bloombridge in 2012 and have changed dramatically since.
Earlier proposals included allotments, more houses, a community hall and a First World War memorial.
Former workshops at the top of the field will now be demolished to make way for residential units, a car park for the use of Nettlestone Primary School and a footpath through the site.
Building work was set to start once reserved matters — including appearance, landscaping, layout and scale — had been approved.
The council said it was likely the application would be reconsidered at the next planning committee meeting on December 17 — but no new comments can be made.
Don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
House Rules
We do not moderate comments, but we expect readers to adhere to certain rules in the interests of open and accountable debate.
Last Updated:
Report this comment Cancel